The Janessa Hannigan case, known as 3:23-cr-00192-AB, is a criminal case in a federal court in Oregon. It’s gotten some attention because it shows how the U.S. legal system works. Janessa Lynn Hannigan, the person accused, had a court hearing about her punishment in December 2024. This article breaks down the case in simple terms, explaining what happened and why it matters.
What’s the Case About?
Janessa Lynn Hannigan is involved in a federal court case in Oregon. The case number, 3:23-cr-00192-AB, tells us it’s a criminal case from 2023. The “AB” points to the judge handling it. Federal cases often deal with serious crimes like drug issues or fraud. We don’t know the exact charges against Hannigan, but the case reached the point where the court decided her punishment.
The U.S. District Court in Oregon deals with federal crimes. It makes sure trials are fair. Hannigan’s case followed the usual steps, like pleading guilty or not guilty, and ended with a punishment decision.
Key Moments in the Case
In December 2024, Hannigan’s lawyer, Amanda Thibeault, filed a document called a sentencing memorandum. This paper asks the judge for a fair punishment. It might talk about Hannigan’s life, like if she’s sorry or has no past crimes. The punishment hearing happened on December 3, 2024, with Chief Judge Michael McShane in charge.
Since the case reached sentencing, Hannigan likely admitted guilt or was found guilty. Federal courts use rules to decide punishments, looking at how serious the crime was and if the person has a criminal record. The judge can choose a punishment based on these rules or adjust it for the situation.
How the Legal System Works
Federal Court Process
Hannigan’s case followed the normal steps for federal crimes. First, someone is charged and goes to court to say if they’re guilty or not. Then, there might be talks about a deal, where the person agrees to admit guilt for a lighter punishment. If no deal is made, there’s a trial. Hannigan’s case ended with a sentencing hearing, which is when the judge decides the punishment.
Federal courts, like the one in Oregon, have prosecutors who try to prove the crime and defense lawyers who protect the accused. Hannigan’s lawyer worked to get her a fair deal.
Why the Sentencing Memorandum Matters
The sentencing memorandum is a big deal. It’s a chance for Hannigan’s lawyer to explain why she deserves a lighter punishment. It might mention her personal life, like if she’s trying to improve or has no prior trouble. The prosecution might also give their side, suggesting a punishment based on the crime. The judge reads these to make a fair decision.
These hearings are open to the public, so people can see what’s happening. This keeps the court system honest and trustworthy.
Why This Case Matters
What It Means for Hannigan
For Janessa Hannigan, this case changes her life. A federal conviction could mean jail time, fines, or rules to follow after release, like probation. Her lawyer’s document tried to get a lighter punishment. The final decision depends on what she did and how she worked with the court.
Punishments often come with extra rules, like paying back money or staying out of trouble. These rules affect Hannigan’s future, like her job or personal life.
Why It’s Important Overall
This case shows how the federal court system works. It’s about balancing punishment with giving people a chance to change. Hannigan’s case is an example of how lawyers and judges handle serious crimes. It also shows why courts need to be fair and open so everyone trusts the system.
Even though we don’t know all the details of Hannigan’s charges, the case helps us understand federal law. It’s a reminder that the legal system affects real people and communities.
Wrapping It Up
The Janessa Hannigan case, 3:23-cr-00192-AB, is an important federal case in Oregon. It reached a punishment hearing in December 2024, showing how courts decide consequences. The case highlights how lawyers fight for their clients and how judges make tough choices. It’s a real-life look at the justice system, showing how it tries to be fair while dealing with serious issues. Understanding this case helps college students see how law impacts people’s lives.